Market Insights

Tiger Cities of Asia: A Look at the M&A Landscape in Hong Kong & Singapore

By 13 September, 2023No Comments

Singapore and Hong Kong


Amidst recent ripples of turbulence in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) landscapes of Hong Kong and Singapore, these two financial powerhouses continue to hold their ground as prominent and resilient markets for business consolidations and strategic partnerships. M&A is an important strategic tool for businesses aiming to achieve growth, enhance competitiveness, and capitalize on synergies. Both Hong Kong and Singapore have established themselves on the international arena as global hubs for conducting M&A transactions. These two dynamic city-economies both provide beneficial environments for domestic and cross-border M&A activities.

This article provides insight into the M&A environments of Hong Kong and Singapore, casting a strategic lens on Hong Kong as a gateway to China and Singapore as a conduit to Southeast Asia. Furthermore, it delves into the M&A landscapes of both jurisdictions providing a brief overview of the regulatory frameworks governing M&A transactions and evaluating their impact on local and cross-border activities.

Regulatory frameworks in Hong Kong and Singapore

The regulatory frameworks in Hong Kong and Singapore are designed to provide a structured approach to M&A transactions while ensuring investor protection and market integrity. This enables efficiency and processual ease. Notably, Hong Kong tends to provide a less regulated environment compared to Singapore, which can be attributed to the cities’ respective geopolitical positioning and strategic priorities.

Table comparing M&A in Hong Kong and SingaporeHong Kong: Leaner Regulation and Closer Ties to China

Hong Kong’s regulatory framework is characterized by a leaner approach, fostering a business-friendly environment. In general, there are no regulatory restrictions on the transfer of shares in a Hong Kong incorporated company unless the target’s business relates to a regulated industry. Regulated industries can be found on Hong Kong’s negative list and examples include sectors such as telecommunications/broadcasting, banking, insurance, and securities.

In Hong Kong, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) plays a pivotal role in supervising public M&A activities. The Takeovers Code, overseen by the SFC, is the principal regulation governing public M&A.

The city’s historical, political, and geographical ties with China influence its regulatory landscape. However, the “one country, two systems” principle has allowed Hong Kong to maintain a high degree of autonomy, with its legal system based on English common law. Due to its proximity and close connections with mainland China, Hong Kong has become the doorway for businesses wishing to develop closer ties with the mainland. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s (HKEX) status as a key listing destination for Chinese companies seeking global exposure further underscores this synergy. In addition, the regulatory alignment between Hong Kong and China allows for smoother integration of cross-border M&A transactions with mainland Chinese entities.

Singapore: Robust Regulation and Southeast Asian Access

In contrast, Singapore’s regulatory framework emphasizes robustness and a well-defined legal environment. This approach is partially informed by Singapore’s positioning as a hub for Southeast Asian investments. The city-state’s geographic location has led to a focus on cultivating relationships and connections with the multitude of nations in the Southeast Asian region.

Similarly, as in Hong Kong, there are no restrictions on foreign investments in Singapore, unless in the context of specific industries and sectors (such as the banking, financial services, defense, and newspaper industries, which require regulatory approval). The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is responsible for overseeing financial institution M&A activities to ensure stability in the financial sector. The Companies Act governs the broader corporate landscape and includes provisions for mergers, amalgamations, and takeovers.

Singapore’s M&A framework is designed to attract international investors while ensuring a secure legal environment. The city’s emphasis on transparency, accountability, and strong investor protection mechanisms bolsters confidence in M&A activities. The lack of direct proximity to any major power and thus regulatory pressure, provides a degree of insulation from potential geopolitical shifts and contributes to regulatory stability.


The contrasting regulatory approaches have implications for M&A efficiency in different scenarios. Hong Kong’s leaner regulatory environment may facilitate quicker transaction processes, particularly in cases where mainland Chinese entities are involved. However, the intertwining of Hong Kong’s regulatory ecosystem with China’s introduces an element of complexity, as regulatory changes in one jurisdiction can have ripple effects in the other.

On the other hand, Singapore’s robust regulatory framework offers greater predictability and stability, which can be advantageous for investors seeking secure environments for M&A transactions. The geographical and political distance from China means that Singapore is not linked to the Chinese regulatory landscape, which can make transactions involving Chinese entities more complex, but it provides the advantage of reduced exposure to potential changes in China’s regulatory policies.

In essence, while Hong Kong’s regulatory approach aligns with its role as a bridge between China and the global market, Singapore’s emphasis on regulatory robustness is linked to its positioning as a stable and secure investment destination within Southeast Asia. As businesses weigh their M&A strategies, considering the nuances of these regulatory frameworks is essential for optimizing transaction efficiency and navigating the intricacies of cross-border deals.

Tax Considerations and Financial Considerations

Tax considerations play a crucial role in M&A transactions and often significantly impact deal structures. Both Hong Kong and Singapore have established favorable tax regimes that contribute to their attractiveness as M&A hubs.

Hong Kong has a territorial tax system and exempts capital gains from taxation. The territorial tax system means that exchange gains and losses are not subject to taxation in Hong Kong. Furthermore, there is no VAT, GST or sales tax and the country’s corporate tax rate is flat at a rate of 16.5%. This simplicity and competitive tax structure makes Hong Kong an appealing destination for M&A transactions.

Just as in Hong Kong, there is no tax on capital gains in Singapore and a territorial tax system is employed. Corporate income tax is imposed at a flat rate of 17% and only on the part of the income which has been generated or received in Singapore. On the other hand, Singapore does have a GST of 8%. Singapore also offers a range of tax incentives to encourage specific industries such as research and development.

Both Hong Kong and Singapore boast well-developed financial markets, robust banking sectors, and favorable business environments that contribute to the financial attractiveness of M&A transactions.

Political Influences on M&A

Political factors, including regulatory stability, government policies, and geopolitical influences, can significantly shape M&A activities. Even though Hong Kong has experienced certain political turbulence recently, both Hong Kong and Singapore have demonstrated a commitment to fostering a pro-business environment. This contributes to a sense of confidence among investors and businesses engaging in M&A transactions in these regions.

Local vs Cross Border Transactions

Singapore’s strategic location and its proactive approach to negotiating international trade agreements have positioned it as an attractive destination for cross-border M&A activities. The city-state’s network of free trade agreements provides investors with access to a broader market and reduced trade barriers. Singapore is thus not only a great jurisdiction for transactions in the region, but also for those with a global structure. Hong Kong’s historical ties with mainland China and its status as an international financial center make it the best a gateway for foreign companies looking to tap into the Chinese market.

While local transactions offer familiarity with domestic regulations and reduced cultural barriers, cross-border deals provide access to new markets, technologies, and talent pools. However, navigating differing regulatory landscapes and potential language barriers can contribute to increased complexities in cross-border transactions.


In the world of mergers and acquisitions, Hong Kong and Singapore stand as two distinct yet not fully dissimilar powerful players. Hong Kong bridges the gap between China and the global market, as well as offers a competitive edge with its efficient regulatory landscape. Singapore on the other hand differentiates itself as a regulatory safe port for investments and offers good access to Southeast Asian markets and beyond.

As businesses plot their M&A strategies it is instrumental to understand the nuances of these financial powerhouses’ regulatory frameworks and how they apply to their specific circumstances. In this dynamic mix of regulations, taxes, and geopolitical factors, Hong Kong, and Singapore both prove their worth as indispensable global hubs for strategic business transactions, and both will certainly remain prominent on tomorrow´s financial world map.

Read more about our capital markets services.

    Ready to talk to our experts?

    The insights provided in this article are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. We do not warrant the reliability, suitability, or correctness of the content. Readers are advised to conduct independent research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Investing in financial markets carries risks, including the risk of loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

    The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the company's official policy. We disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of or reliance on this article or its content. ARC Group relies on reliable sources, data, and individuals for its analysis, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Forward-looking information is based on subjective judgments about the future and should be used cautiously. We cannot guarantee the fulfillment of forecasts and forward-looking estimates. Any investment decisions based on our information should be independently made by the investor.

    Readers are encouraged to assess their financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before making any financial decisions, seeking professional advice as needed.