Bangladesh Apparel Industry: Navigating Global Challenges

• Bangladesh, the world’s second-largest garment exporter, is facing challenges due to political instability and labor issues, threatening its role in the global supply chain.
• Major fashion brands are shifting sourcing to countries like Cambodia and Indonesia, reducing their reliance on Bangladesh by up to 30%.
• To stay competitive, Bangladesh must address labor conditions, invest in sustainability, and build resilience against political risks.

Bangladesh, the world’s second-largest garment exporter after China, plays a crucial role in the global apparel industry, which is projected to grow by $1.7 trillion by 2029 at a CAGR of 4.63%. Employing over 4 million people, the industry contributes 85% of Bangladesh’s export revenue and 15% of its GDP, with annual exports exceeding $30 billion. Known for its low labor costs, Bangladesh remains a key sourcing hub for major fashion brands, from fast fashion to luxury, many of which bear the “Made in Bangladesh” label.

However, despite these advantages, the country’s position as a global sourcing hub is increasingly threatened by political instability and evolving global priorities, particularly around sustainability.

Bangladesh’s appeal as a sourcing destination is largely driven by its low labor costs. The minimum wage for garment workers is just $133 per month, significantly lower than China’s $800, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious brands. However, this cost advantage comes at the expense of labor stability. Workers in Bangladesh often endure precarious working conditions, marked by low pay, inadequate safety measures, and limited labor rights. This is further exacerbated by the country’s growing political instability, which has severely disrupted its apparel sector. Protests, strikes, and political unrest have made sourcing decisions increasingly risky, leading many companies to reconsider their reliance on Bangladesh. The intersection of labor instability and political challenges is reshaping sourcing strategies as brands seek more stable alternatives. This political instability, compounded by supply chain disruptions, is forcing companies to reconsider their reliance on Bangladesh, as they seek not only operational resilience but alignment with global sustainability goals.

How Bangladesh’s Political Climate is Impacting the Apparel Industry

Despite its economic progress, Bangladesh faces significant political unrest, which is disrupting its apparel sector. Protests over government job quotas and high youth unemployment, worsened by global economic turmoil, have weakened the country’s currency and international reserves. The apparel industry has been particularly hard hit, with major brands like H&M and Zara pausing operations. This political instability is forcing companies to reconsider their reliance on Bangladesh, as protests, communication blackouts, and supply chain disruptions become more frequent.

The Shift in Global Sourcing Strategies

The ongoing protests have left over 30 million people, from a population of 170 million, without access to jobs or education. The political unrest has also triggered violence and communication blackouts, severely disrupting supply chains. Bangladesh’s ready-made garment industry, a key driver of the country’s economic growth, has been hit particularly hard. Major retailers, such as H&M—which sources more than $3 billion worth of products from Bangladesh each year—and Zara, whose parent company Inditex is one of the largest buyers in the region, have temporarily shut down operations. Meanwhile, Uniqlo, with approximately 50 production partners in the country, has yet to comment on the situation, though winter apparel deliveries have been delayed. The entire supply chain is under significant pressure.

For instance, the Apex factory in suburban Bangladesh was forced to close for nine days and later had to compensate by extending work shifts. Approximately 8,000 employees, mostly women, working for Dethcalon and Wolverine brands, have been required to endure long production hours. Globally, the sourcing situation remains precarious, as noted by Maersk’s head of lifestyle, with regional difficulties compounding the challenges faced by key suppliers like Bangladesh. Overstocked clothing led to a shift to air transportation to meet delivery deadlines, which in turn reduced profitability. To diversify supply chains and lessen reliance on air logistics, alternative transport models have been implemented.

In response to the turmoil, many companies have shifted their sourcing to other locations, with Southeast Asia emerging as an attractive alternative. According to the Financial Times, Apex Footwear’s managing director, whose company supplies French brand Dethcalon and Japan’s Uniqlo, expressed that international confidence in Bangladesh has weakened. European suppliers reported moving approximately 40% of their purchases to Cambodia and Indonesia, while some large groups have reduced their sourcing from Bangladesh by 30%.

Comparative Analysis of Global Apparel Sourcing: Bangladesh vs. Other Key Markets

The textile industry faces significant challenges from excess production and delayed deliveries, largely driven by an inventory build-up that has heavily impacted Bangladesh, a major apparel exporter. This challenge, which began with the pandemic’s drop in consumer demand, has been further aggravated by ongoing economic complexities. According to the founder of London-based Machine-A, the problem existed prior to the pandemic but has accelerated in recent years, leading to reduced orders for many Bangladeshi factories. As brands shift their focus toward localizing and diversifying suppliers, they are seeking ways to reduce risk and improve negotiation leverage.

Nearshoring has gained traction, with fashion businesses relying less on frequent production site visits and instead reusing returned products, as highlighted by Vogue Business in an interview with Niel Shelton. This shift is forcing Bangladeshi suppliers to adopt new strategies, but it also presents challenges. The diversification of sourcing away from Bangladesh, compounded by nearshoring trends, has reduced its share of orders. Additionally, the increased focus on sustainability, with brands aiming to lower their environmental impact, has further eroded Bangladesh’s competitiveness, as its strengths lie in mass garment production rather than eco-friendly processes.

Amidst the current landscape, suppliers are adopting new strategies to adapt, which has posed challenges for Bangladesh. The diversification of sourcing has led to a reduction in Bangladesh’s share of orders, while nearshoring has decreased reliance on the country. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on sustainability, as brands aim to reduce their environmental impact and waste, has made Bangladesh less competitive, as its advantage largely lies in mass garment production.

Bangladesh has long attracted international businesses with its low labor costs, making it a key manufacturing hub. However, ongoing conflicts and government impunity are prompting companies to rethink their strategies for more resilient operations. McKinsey Consulting reports that businesses are now prioritizing stronger supplier relationships, closer collaboration, and greater transparency. Similarly, ARC Consulting’s 2024 Sourcing Survey reveals that companies are focusing on improved communication with suppliers to receive timely, accurate information and mitigate risks. As a result, Bangladesh’s position as a top sourcing destination is weakening as businesses shift to more politically stable countries.

Industry Insights and Recommendations:

As Bangladesh continues to be a major player in the global apparel industry, the sector faces significant challenges due to political instability, evolving sourcing strategies, and increasing emphasis on sustainability. While the country remains attractive due to its low labor costs, its competitive edge is being undermined by disruptions in supply chains, labor issues, and shifting global market demands. To remain relevant in this dynamic environment, suppliers in Bangladesh must:

1. Build Resilience in the Face of Political Instability: Suppliers must acknowledge that political factors can directly affect their operations and take proactive steps to mitigate the risks by improving internal resilience and securing better communication with international buyers. Hence, investing in political risk insurance and contingency planning is necessary to cushion the effects of sudden disruptions in production or logistics, thereby reducing downtime and potential financial losses.
2. Adapting to Global Shifts in Sourcing: Suppliers must explore ways to offer competitive advantages beyond low labor costs—such as improving production flexibility, offering faster lead times, or even looking into nearshoring partnerships where production can happen both locally and abroad. Besides, digital communications and transparency can be enhanced through digitalization for tracking production inventory and logistics systems.
3. Focus on Sustainability to Stay Competitive: Suppliers must invest in sustainable production technologies, eco-friendly materials, and waste reduction processes to remain relevant in competitiveness besides cost. Adopting certification programs can help validate these efforts and appeal to sustainability-focused brands. Nevertheless, improving labor conditions in worker safety, fair wages, and working conditions to address concerns raised by international buyers about the ethical aspects of sourcing from Bangladesh.
4. Nearshoring, Diversification, and Risk Management: Suppliers can explore partnerships or joint ventures in nearby markets, such as Southeast Asia countries to counteract the shift towards nearshoring that will allow them to maintain a foothold in the global supply chain for agility and flexibility in responding to consumer demand fluctuations, seasonal trends, and reducing carbon footprints through shorter shipping routes. Besides, to safeguard against reduced demand, Bangladeshi suppliers should consider diversifying their production capabilities to better respond to the changing demands of brands and mitigate risks associated with large-scale, low-margin orders.
5. Strengthening Supplier Relationships: Suppliers should enhance communication with their buyers, offer real-time updates on production and inventory, and provide accurate and timely data. By doing this, suppliers in Bangladesh can improve trust and ensure a smoother flow of goods even during disruptions.

In conclusion, while Bangladesh remains a key player in the global apparel industry, its future competitiveness will depend on how effectively it responds to current challenges. Low labor costs and significant production capacity have long been its strengths, but political instability, evolving sourcing trends, and heightened sustainability demands are now undermining these advantages.

Read more about our advisory & strategy expertise